Skip to content
  • GET LEGAL HELP TODAY   |
  • (612) 255-3820
  • Home
  • About
    • Derek Archambault
  • Practice Areas
    • Assault
    • Controlled Substance Crimes
    • Criminal Defense
    • Driving While Impaired (DWI)
    • Expungement
    • Harassment
    • Probation Violations
    • Sex Crimes
    • Theft and Property Crimes
    • Weapon Offenses
  • Blog
  • FAQs
  • Case Results
  • Free Consultation
  • Home
  • About
    • Derek Archambault
  • Practice Areas
    • Assault
    • Controlled Substance Crimes
    • Criminal Defense
    • Driving While Impaired (DWI)
    • Expungement
    • Harassment
    • Probation Violations
    • Sex Crimes
    • Theft and Property Crimes
    • Weapon Offenses
  • Blog
  • FAQs
  • Case Results
  • Free Consultation
FREE CONSULTATION
  • 5
  • May

The Importance of Good Lawyering

  • Legal Strategies

Earlier this week, the Minnesota Court of Appeals issued an interesting ruling highlighting the need for defense attorneys to be aware of the precise statutory requirements for DWI investigations in Minnesota.  In this case, a man was pulled over and arrested for driving while under the influence.  The arresting officer obtained a search warrant for the man’s urine or blood and asked him to provide a blood sample.  She told the man that it would be an additional crime for him to refuse to take a test.  This is more or less true, but the trooper neglected to mention one important thing – in Minnesota, officers must offer suspects both a blood and a urine test before that person can be charged with test refusal.  (Note- this is only true for blood and urine tests.  If an officer requests a breath test, they need not offer an alternative test before charging the crime of test refusal!)

In this particular case, the officer told the man she had arrested, “I applied for a search warrant for a blood draw, and refusal to take a test is a crime.”  Notice the subtle error in her wording here – she did not inform the driver that she would need to also offer an alternative urine test before charging test refusal.  This inaccuracy led the court to throw out the test results in this particular case.

This case is notable not so much because of the legal principles involved, but because it highlights the benefit of having experienced counsel representing you in a DWI case.  A simple error in wording here led to a dramatic result for this driver.  Such a minor detail is easy to miss if you don’t know what you’re looking for. 

PrevPrevious Article
Next ArticleNext

Let’s Talk

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name *
Checkboxes *

Please review our Privacy Policy

Loading

Start Your Defense

No obligation, no pressure, and no annoying follow up calls. For a free legal consultation, fill out the form or text/call anytime.
  • New Clients: (612) 255-3820
  • Existing Clients: (612) 488-5455

Schedule A Consultation Today!

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes *

Please review our Privacy Policy

Loading
About Me

I never expected to be called to work in criminal defense.  For many years I found work as a prosecutor fulfilling.  But over time that changed.  Rather than making a difference, I was a cog in the machine.  Cases stopped feeling like people and became names on paper.   And I realized that often the true difference makers in the system are the defense attorneys.

I founded Archambault Criminal Defense because I want to use my skills to help people.  Because I want my cases to be about people and not just names on paper.  Because I know I have unique expertise and experience that can truly help people move forward and get on with their lives.

Learn more
  • Practice Areas
  • Contact
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy & Disclaimer
  • Practice Areas
  • Contact
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy & Disclaimer

contact

  • New Clients:
    (612) 255-3820
  • Existing Clients:
    (612) 488-5455
  • [email protected]
400 S 4th St 3rd Floor, Minneapolis, MN 55415

Also Serving St. Louis Park MN.

FREE CONSULTATION
  • Criminal Defense Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Assault Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • DWI Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Drug Crime Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Felony Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Misdemeanor Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Domestic Assault Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Probation Violation Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Expungement Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Shoplifting Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Criminal Defense Lawyer Bloomington MN
  • Drug Crime Lawyer Bloomington MN
  • Drug Crime Possession Lawyer Bloomington, MN
  • DWI Lawyer Bloomington, MN
  • Theft Lawyer Bloomington MN
  • Criminal Defense Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Assault Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • DWI Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Drug Crime Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Felony Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Misdemeanor Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Domestic Assault Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Probation Violation Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Expungement Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Shoplifting Lawyer Minneapolis MN
  • Criminal Defense Lawyer Bloomington MN
  • Drug Crime Lawyer Bloomington MN
  • Drug Crime Possession Lawyer Bloomington, MN
  • DWI Lawyer Bloomington, MN
  • Theft Lawyer Bloomington MN

The information contained in this website is not legal advice, but is provided for general informational purposes only.  Users should not act or fail to act in reliance on the information in this website without first consulting with a qualified attorney.  Viewing this website, acting upon information contained in this website, or contacting Archambault Criminal Defense does not create an attorney-client relationship.  Any attorney-client relationship is formed only by express written agreement.

© 2025 Archambault Criminal Defense | Sitemap | Terms and Conditions